When you
take reading as a hard fought effort, as a promise of finding things that surprise
and fascinate you even as you read many things that fall far below that mark,
every now and again you come across a novel that keeps its promises to the reader. Doris Lessing’s The Golden Notebook does just that.
It is completely realized in almost every conceivable way. A fully wrought vision of the novel, both as
it is and what it can be.
At 635
pages of text, Lessing has ample space to take on almost every major topic in
the post-war, postmodern literary grab bag.
The novel is feminist, post-colonial, post-communist, late capitalist, meta-fiction
in the sense that it is concerned with itself as art, and explores the nature of
art and the artists. There are stories
within stories, diary entries, letters, and a fractured text looping back into
itself. But all this is a dry recitation
of its virtues as an “important” novel. Its
real success is elsewhere.
Foremost,
The Golden Notebook never sacrifices
itself to the altar of these various “isms.”
Quite the contrary, it is novel about the impossibility to qualify and
categorize life by any system, whether it be art, politics, religion, or
science. Life is simply too multivariate
to fit into one mold. So we get a novel
which displays the characters’ lives in maddening, sometimes grotesque
ways. Everything is open to
investigation, and nothing is sacred.
No comments:
Post a Comment