The People’s History of the United States is a difficult book to critique, as its assumptions and results align with my social and philosophical worldview. But is that enough to say this book uses sound methodology to reach its conclusions? I think not. This book is massive in scope, and therefore uses secondary sources. Yet looking at the sources Zinn choses leaves me skeptical.
Toward the end of this book, he writes that his work is “...a biased account, one that leans in a certain direction.” We can certainly say this of this work, and other more ‘mainstream’ histories. It is biased in one direction, as are all historical accounts. So how do we make decisions about historical veracity?